That term is littered throughout the EU AI Act and the EU GDPR, from their very first recitals, and the EU AI Act has added a new, key acronym for compliance practitioners: the FRIA, or the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment.
So what are these ‘fundamental rights’?
Frustratingly, neither the EU AI Act (180 Recitals, 113 Articles and 13 Annexes), nor the GDPR (173 Recitals and 99 Articles) expressly define ‘fundamental rights’.
While their recitals point us to EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (which everyone just calls ‘the Charter’), it would have been good to have a definition such as ‘fundamental rights means the rights set out in the Charter’. No such luck.
Happily, however, the EU has a page on Fundamental rights in the European Union, with a ‘Legal instruments’ section confirming:
Your fundamental rights are protected in the EU at:
- national level – by EU countries’ constitutional systems
- EU level – by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Next, how comprehensive is the Charter?
As the EU’s Agency for Fundamental Rights states:

The Charter of Fundamental Rights is the European Union’s bill of human rights. Its 50 articles bring together the rights and freedoms belonging to everyone in the EU.
The FRA’s website has the text of the Charter in easily digestible format, caselaw and publications, it’s a great resource.
The EU, on its EU Justice site, helpfully confirms:
The Charter:
- brings together all the rights (personal, civic, political, economic, social) enjoyed by people within the EU, in a single text
- codifies them as a series of fundamental rights [and]
- contains more recent rights, such as data protection and good administration.
So the EU itself states that the Convention brings together all the rights enjoyed by people within the EU into a single text, which makes life easier for practitioners – with the caveat that you always need to be aware of other rights (if any) provided under any Member State or other legislation or case law specific to your industry and use case. It goes without saying this is an EU Treaty, not to be confused with the ECHR (more on that below).
The Charter sets out the fundamental rights in 50 Articles gathered into 6 groups or ‘Titles’, with 4 more Articles in the 7th Title dealing with scope, interpretation, effect etc.
Articles 1 to 5
Includes rights to human dignity and life, and the prohibition of torture and slavery, etc.
Articles 6 to 19
Includes rights to liberty, respect for private and family life, protection of personal data, right to marry, freedoms of thought, conscience, religion, association, to engage in work, conduct a business, right to asylum etc.
Articles 20 to 26
Includes equality before the law and between men and women, non-discrimination, rights of the child and the elderly and integration of persons with disabilities etc.
Articles 27 to 38
Includes workers rights, prohibition of child labour, social security, health care, environmental protection, consumer protection, etc.
Articles 39 to 46
Includes the right to vote and to stand as a candidate, to good administration, access to documents, freedom of movement and of residence etc.
Articles 47 to 50
Includes the right to an effective remedy, a fair trial, presumption of innocence and right of defence etc.
Articles 51 to 54
Contains rules on the field of application, scope and interpretation of rights and principles etc.
It’s interesting (well, we think it’s interesting!) to see what rights are expressly referred to in the EU AI Act, not least as examples of the fundamental rights you should consider first and foremost when you carry out a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment.
In its first Recital, the Act refers to democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection:
The purpose of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market by laying down a uniform legal framework in particular for the development, the placing on the market, the putting into service and the use of artificial intelligence systems … while ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’), including democracy, the rule of law and environmental protection ….
Other Recitals and Articles in the EU AI Act call out the following fundamental rights, or impacts on them (using the Act’s wording, which tracks but isn’t always identical to the Convention’s Articles, it’s clear what they refer to):
GDPRs’s Recitals 1 and 4 confirm it’s not just about Privacy:
(1) The protection of natural persons in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and Article 16(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provide that everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her.
(4) … The right to the protection of personal data is not an absolute right … This Regulation respects all fundamental rights and observes the freedoms and principles recognised in the Charter as enshrined in the Treaties, in particular the respect for private and family life, home and communications, the protection of personal data, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and information, freedom to conduct a business, the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, and cultural, religious and linguistic diversity.
As well as the broad and specific references to rights in Recital 4, the EU GDPR relies throughout on a catch-all reference to the fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects, which is one of the most commonly used terms in GDPR. This reflects the foundational nature of the right to protection of personal data and the dangers when that right is not protected. As GDPR’s Recital 3 states:
[GDPR] is intended to contribute to the accomplishment of an area of freedom, security and justice and of an economic union, to economic and social progress, to the strengthening and the convergence of the economies within the internal market, and to the well-being of natural persons.
Of course, GDPR grants express rights to data subjects, such as:
GDPR’s Recitals refer to the Art 16 and Art 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
The TFEU is one of the EU’s two foundational treaties (the other is the Treaty on European Union (TEU) which isn’t relevant here). You’ll see that the TFEU also has many Articles setting out fundamental rights such as equality, anti-discrimination and the right to vote. It sits alongside the Convention but, as we saw above, the EU itself notes that the Convention codifies such rights into a single document.
While it is called a Convention, since 2009, the Convention became legally binding, with the same effect as an EU Treaty, with the coming into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009 (FRA).
Art 6(1) of the TFEU states:
The Union recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of 7 December 2000, as adapted at Strasbourg, on 12 December 2007, which shall have the same legal value as the Treaties.
Art 6(2) of TFEU states that the EU ‘shall accede to The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ or the ECHR.
Despite its name, the ECHR is not an EU ‘thing’. For example, it’s been signed and ratified by the UK, Turkey and Russia.
The ECHR ‘was opened for signature in Rome on 4 November 1950 and came into force on 3 September 1953’, brought into being in the aftermath of World War II and certainly predating the EU. ‘It was the first instrument to give effect to certain of the rights stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and make them binding.’
All EEA Member States have signed the ECHR. As at 24 October 2025, the EU has not, though it’s expected to, and it’s obligated to under Art 6(2) of the TFEU.
We hope this has been helpful in understanding what fundamental rights are for the EU GDPR and the EU AI Act, in particular the FRIA, the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment required under Art 27. Now you now know where to look for them, and how to think about them.
You should consider all the fundamental rights when you do you FRIA, but don’t worry, there aren’t that many and you’ll be able to quickly write off rights that aren’t impacted, and zero in on the rights that are most relevant to your use.
While the AI Office is mandated under the EU AI Act to ‘develop a template for a questionnaire, including through an automated tool, to facilitate deployers in complying with their obligations under this [Art 27] in a simplified manner’, they’ve not done so at the time of writing, and you’ll want to draft yours outside that system until you’re happy.
You can build ANY assessment in Keepabl and it’s super simple and usable, as Gamma Communications found in creating its DPIA:
We created our DPIA template in Keepabl and our Users couldn’t believe how easy the template builder was to use. You can tell every bit of Keepabl is created with the end user’s experience in mind.
See how Keepabl can help you with DPIAs, FRIAs and many more – book your demo now!
Happy Halloween from the team at Keepabl! To celebrate one of our favourite seasons, here are some of the best horror-themed Privacy puns we could think of: The Excelcist Right…
Well, with previous regulators and commentators coming down on either side, and on the fence, over the DPF, no-one said the passage of the EC’s draft adequacy decision would be…